U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

SRX2529398: GSM2472802: MNASE DST1D mutant rep 2; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; MNase-Seq
1 ILLUMINA (Illumina HiSeq 2000) run: 34.6M spots, 1.7G bases, 1Gb downloads

Submitted by: NCBI (GEO)
Study: Subtracting the sequence bias from partially digested MNase-seq data reveals a general contribution of TFIIS to nucleosome dynamics
show Abstracthide Abstract
Understanding chromatin dynamics is a key to other related processes, including DNA replication, transcription and recombination. As a first step, recently, an increasing amount of effort has been devoted to precisely define nucleosome positioning in different organisms. The most popular method to do so is digestion by Micrococcal nuclease (MNase), nowadays followed by ultrasequencing of the generated fragments. Although the sequence bias of MNase has been known for a long time, a data-based way of correcting this bias for sequencing experiments is still missing. Here we provide such a method, based on the digestion of naked DNA and the use of the bioinformatic tool DANPOS. Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model, we demonstrate that the overall quality of the data is better after the correction proposed here. The characteristics of the method make it perfectly applicable to any other organism. Moreover, we find that the correction affects more to TATA containing genes than to TATA-like genes. Importantly, the correction uncovers a new role for TFIIS in chromatin dynamics. The absence of TFIIS caused a general increase in nucleosome fuzziness, and a higher peak of the -1 nucleosome at some promoters Overall design: Mnase-Seq experiments in both strains WT and dst1? mutant
Sample: MNASE DST1D mutant rep 2
SAMN06284181 • SRS1950362 • All experiments • All runs
Library:
Instrument: Illumina HiSeq 2000
Strategy: MNase-Seq
Source: GENOMIC
Selection: MNase
Layout: SINGLE
Construction protocol: 500 ml of yeast culture growing exponentially were cross-linked by the addition of formaldehyde to a final concentration of 1 %, followed by 15 minutes of incubation at room temperature. For quenching, glycine was added to 2 % and the sample incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature. Cells were washed three times with cold distilled water. Then, they were resuspended in 10 ml of Buffer Z2 (1 M Sorbitol; 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4; 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol). Spheroplasts were prepared by adding 50 μl of Zymolyase 100T (20 μg/ml). Samples were incubated at 30 ºC during approximately 30 minutes until the optical density at 600 nm was around 10 % of the initial. After washing two times the spheroplasts with cold washing buffer I (1 M sorbitol; 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8; 1 mM EDTA; 150 mM NaCl), they were resuspended in 1,5 ml of buffer II (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8; 1 mM EDTA; 150 mM NaCl; 0.1 mM PMSF; 0.2 % Triton X-100). Spheroplasts were separated in 5 tubes with 3 ml of MNase buffer (15 mM Tris-HCl pH 8; 50 mM NaCl; 1.4 mM CaCl2; 0.2 mM EGTA; 0.2 mM EDTA) and different amounts of microccocal nuclease ranging from 500 to 10 mU. Samples were incubated for 30 minutes at 37 ºC, and reactions were stopped by adding 100 μl of stop buffer (0.4 M EDTA; 0.3 M Tris-HCl pH 8) and 150 μl of 10 % SDS. Subsequently, the samples were treated with 75 μl of proteinase K (20 mg/ml) for 30 minutes at 37 ºC, and then at 65 ºC for at least 1 hour. After phenol/chloroform/isoamylic alcohol extraction, DNA was ethanol-precipitated, resupended in double-distilled water and treated with 170 µg/ml RNase A for 30 minutes at room temperature. Digested DNA was resolved in 2 % agarose gels. One of the digestions was chosen, with the following criteria: 1) the trinucleosome band was visible, indicating that there was negligible overdigestion; 2) the mononucleosome band was the most intense (see Fig. 1). The band corresponding to mononucleosomes was purified using Quiagen Gel Extraction kit. DNAs were analyzed by real-time quantitative PCR or ultrasequencing. The naked DNA was prepared by treating the cells exactly as before up to the point of the RNase treatment, with the only difference that no MNase was added. From there, naked DNA was divided into four different tubes with MNase buffer and different ammounts of MNase ranging from 15 to 1 mU. The digestion with a range of fragments similar to that of the chosen chromatin sample (see Fig. 1) was electrophoresed in parallel with the chromatin sample. A slice of gel containing those naked DNA fragments with a similar size to the mononucleosome was cut and the DNA purified
Experiment attributes:
GEO Accession: GSM2472802
Links:
Runs: 1 run, 34.6M spots, 1.7G bases, 1Gb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR521925734,568,1471.7G1Gb2017-11-30

ID:
3660161

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...